Events
Symposium at Cornell
Organized by the Future of Minority Studies Research Project (FMS)
www.fmsproject.cornell.edu
29-30th July 2005
“Disability Studies
and the Realist Theory of Identity”
Conceived and organized by Tobin
Siebers (V. L. Parrington Professor of Literary and Cultural Criticism,
University of Michigan)
Participants:
Michael Hames-García (English, Binghamton University)
Rosemarie Garland-Thomson (Women’s Studies, Emory University)
Satya P. Mohanty (English, Cornell University)
Carrie Sandahl (School of Theatre, State University of Florida)
Alice Sheppard (English, Pennsylvania State University)
Tobin Siebers (V. L. Parrington Professor of Literary and Cultural
Criticism, University of Michigan)
The Topic:
Speakers in these two panels will address the intersection between
disability studies and the realist theory of identity, using a set
of core texts as the jumping-off point. Some questions concern: disability
embodiment as an effect of the real; the role of experience in theories
of identity; the advantages and disadvantages of social construction
as a theory of disability; and activist and advocacy concerns shared
by disability studies and realist philosophy.
Required Readings:
Alcoff, Linda Martín. "Who’s Afraid of Identity
Politics?" Reclaiming Identity: Realist Theory and the Predicament
of Postmodernism. Ed. Paula Moya and Michael Hames-García.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. Pp .312-344.
An analysis of the philosophical realist tradition and how it might
serve to redefine the current poststructuralist critique of identity.
It engages Judith Butler’s formulation of identity by offering
an alternative understanding of identity as a realist narrative from
which political positions might emerge.
Brown, Wendy. “Wounded Attachments.” States of Injury:
Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP,
1995. Pp. 52-76.
A critique of identity as a “wounded attachment” and
an appeal to shift our concept of identity from what we are to what
we want, thus moving from identity to political action.
Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. “Integrating Disability, Transforming
Feminist Theory.” National Women’s Studies Association
Journal 14.3 (Fall 2002): 1-32.
A four part definition of feminist disability studies, theorizing
the relation between femininity and disability as socially constructed
identities and systems. The rubrics discussed are body, representation,
identity, and activism.
Johnson, Harriet McBryde. “Unspeakable Conversations.” The
New York Times Magazine, 16 February 2003. (p. 50-55, 74, 78-79.
An essay showing how Johnson’s experience as a disabled person
counters mainstream beliefs about quality of life. It also asks us
to explore the definition of the human.
Moya, Paula M. L. “Postmodernism, ‘Realism,’ and
the Politics of Identity: Cherríe Moraga and Chicana Feminism.” Reclaiming
Identity: Realist Theory and the Predicament of Postmodernism. Ed.
Paula Moya and Michael Hames-García. Berkeley: University
of California Press, 2000. Pp .67-101.
Proposes a realist theory of Chicana identity as a critique of the
poststructuralist rejection of identity categories.
Postmodernism,"Realism"and the Politics of Identity
Sandahl, Carrie. “Black Man, Blind Man: Disability Identity
Politics and Performance.” Theatre Journal 56 (2004): 579-602.
Makes an argument for identity politics based on disability in the
context of performance theory, using realist ideas about identity.
Siebers, Tobin. “Disability in Theory: From Social Constructionism
to the New Realism of the Body.” American Literary History 13.4 (2001): 737-54.
Description of weak and strong versions of social constructionism
relative to a realist view of the disabled body as a living entity
that changes representation.
Recommended Readings:
Baynton, Douglas, C. “ Disability and the Justification of
Inequality in American History.” The New Disability History:
American Perspectives. Ed. Paul K. Longmore and Lauri Umamsky. NY:
New York UP, 2001. Pp. 33-57.
Explores the ways in which allegations of disability and impairment
have been used to marginalize other minority groups, illuminating
how these groups have had to deflect and reject these allegations
as a means of confronting oppression, stigma, and prejudice. The
essay avoids a "hierarchy" of forms of oppression, although
it tends to trigger discussions in this vein anyway. The most important
conversation the essay tends to trigger is how different groups can
move forward in coalition given the ways in which groups have been
pitted against one another in the past.
Brown, Wendy. “Postmodern Exposures, Feminist Hesitations.” States
of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
UP, 1995. Pp. 30-51.
Discusses feminist hesitations about postmodern theories of the
subject and politics.
Johnson, Harriet McBryde. “Not Dead at All: Why Congress Was
Right to Stick Up for Terri Schiavo.” Slate, 23 March 2005.
Url: slate.msn.com/id/2115208/
An essay on Terri Schiavo, discussing the stakes for people with
disabilities in conversations about prenatal screening/selective
abortion, euthanasia, and physician assisted suicide. These issues
are pressing for the disability community right now and serve as
a "litmus" test for potential breaking points in coalitions
between this community and many progressives and liberals who might
otherwise be allies of the disability community.
Weisman, Leslie Kanes. “Creating the Universally Designed
City: Prospects for the New Century.” Universal Design
Handbook.
New York: McGraw Hill, 2001. Pp. 69.1-69.18.
A manifesto about universal design, describing both disability and
the disabling effects of the environment relative to other minority
categories. Is the concept of universal design useful to the realist
project?
|